The Climate First Bank Health Rating is a comprehensive assessment that evaluates the sustainability performance of financial institutions, particularly their commitment to mitigating climate change and fostering social and environmental well-being. Developed by the non-profit organization BankTrack, this rating system provides a detailed analysis of banks' policies, practices, and investments in relation to climate change and other sustainability-related factors.
The Climate First Bank Health Rating plays a crucial role in:
1. Data Collection: BankTrack collects data from publicly available sources, such as banks' annual reports, sustainability disclosures, and regulatory filings.
2. Assessment Criteria: The rating system evaluates banks based on a comprehensive set of criteria, including:
* **Climate Change Policy and Strategy:** Alignment with the Paris Agreement, climate risk management, and emission reduction targets.
* **Fossil Fuel Finance:** Lending and investment in coal, oil, and gas projects.
* **Deforestation Finance:** Lending and investment in companies involved in deforestation.
* **Indigenous Rights:** Respect for the rights of Indigenous peoples and their traditional lands.
* **Social and Environmental Impact:** Assessment of banks' practices in areas such as human rights, labor standards, and biodiversity conservation.
3. Rating Methodology: Banks are assigned a rating on a scale from 1 to 5, where:
* 1: **Very Poor**
* 2: **Poor**
* 3: **Moderate**
* 4: **Good**
* 5: **Very Good**
The 2023 Climate First Bank Health Rating assessed 60 of the world's largest banks. Key findings include:
Pros:
Cons:
The Climate First Bank Health Rating is an essential tool for driving positive change in the financial sector. By using this rating system, individuals and organizations can support banks that prioritize sustainability and hold them accountable for their climate-related impacts. Together, we can create a more sustainable financial system that benefits society and the planet.
Rating | Number of Banks | Percentage |
---|---|---|
1 (Very Poor) | 15 | 25% |
2 (Poor) | 18 | 30% |
3 (Moderate) | 17 | 28% |
4 (Good) | 7 | 12% |
5 (Very Good) | 3 | 5% |
Rating | Average Fossil Fuel Lending (USD Billion) |
---|---|
1 (Very Poor) | 85.4 |
2 (Poor) | 67.2 |
3 (Moderate) | 43.1 |
4 (Good) | 28.3 |
5 (Very Good) | 14.7 |
Rating | Average Deforestation Lending (USD Billion) |
---|---|
1 (Very Poor) | 12.3 |
2 (Poor) | 9.4 |
3 (Moderate) | 6.5 |
4 (Good) | 3.7 |
5 (Very Good) | 1.8 |
2024-11-17 01:53:44 UTC
2024-11-18 01:53:44 UTC
2024-11-19 01:53:51 UTC
2024-08-01 02:38:21 UTC
2024-07-18 07:41:36 UTC
2024-12-23 02:02:18 UTC
2024-11-16 01:53:42 UTC
2024-12-22 02:02:12 UTC
2024-12-20 02:02:07 UTC
2024-11-20 01:53:51 UTC
2024-12-16 20:10:13 UTC
2024-12-25 01:40:06 UTC
2024-12-09 04:07:30 UTC
2024-12-14 19:19:35 UTC
2024-12-22 03:26:00 UTC
2024-12-30 05:57:56 UTC
2024-12-31 09:22:21 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:39 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:39 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:36 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:34 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:33 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:31 UTC
2025-01-08 06:15:31 UTC